There Is Life On Other Planets
Most people would argue with anyone who says that we are the only form of life in the
Universe but there are also many who would tell you that we are not the only living
creatures that could live in a universe so vast and unknown. In this essay I will try and prove to whomever reads this essay that life does in fact exist on other plants and we are not alone in this universe. Have you ever looked up at the stars and wondered what could be out there? After you read this essay your view on whether or not we are alone in the galaxy might change. There is life on other plants and I believe this because of the following three points and I will share them with you in this essay. The three points are as follows: How can we be the only species alive in a universe so big and we don't even know what is passed our own galaxy never mind an entire universe. The second point is that those "7 Wonders of The World" could not have been made by humans and the third and final point is that with all the reports of encounters and abductions its impossible for all those people to report similar things and have it all made up.
My first point to support my theory that live does exists on other planets is that I believe that in a universe so big and unexplored how humans can be the only form of intelligent creatures. There have to be species out there that are as intelligent if not more advance then humans. If the universe is so big and humans can only go so far with the technology we have now then how we know for sure that maybe there isn't another planet out there with life on it that is 20 years ahead of us technologically. One day we will be able to see beyond...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%
There is a cure. Essay on Censorship1002 words - 4 pages There is an epidemic in our country, and it is growing stronger daily. Someone is notbeing allowed to live her/ his life to the fullest degree because of this disease. Its traits can befound in every city, town, and state across the country. No, this epidemic is not AIDS or cancer:however, if left alone, its long term effects can be just as detrimental. The name of the epidemic iscensorship, and last year, the...
Is there anything in life worth dying for?570 words - 2 pages For most people, Life is very close and cherished to them. They yearn to enjoy every single moment in life and wish they could live forever. People believe there is nothing in life that is worth dying for. On the contrary, I believe there are some situations and values that are worth dying for as they are really important. Conversely, I consider there are some matters that tempt people to die for, but are not worth it.For example, if...
This paper about the art of PRINTMAKING, and how it is done in other countries. There are specific examples as well.694 words - 3 pages At a time where the American people are living in a state of limbo between fear and power, a piece of home is much welcomed. Those who lost loved ones in 9/11 or in the continuous war look for memories in the (smallest) things. Objects in a family room tend to keep memories, and the mere sight of them releases these memories. This idea is shown through a very elaborate chandelier photographed by
Research Paper on Mcdonald's Being an Evil Corporation. Mainly Mcdonald's Being The Worst Compared to any Other Fast Food Restaurant Out There.1597 words - 6 pages McDonald, An Evil Corporation PAGE 1 RUNNING HEAD: McDonald, An Evil CorporationMcDonald, An Evil CorporationMcDonald = EVILWhy must people live their life through ignorance knowing that their ignorant habits are not only hurting themselves, but their family, friends and the society around them? Americans feel that because we are the number one country with the biggest...
This essay is basically just research on Kenya...Different activities, what people do there, eat, etc.562 words - 2 pages White sand beaches, fringed with palms, casuarinas, oleanders, and brilliant bougainvillea, washed by the incredible blue waters of the Indian Ocean. Kenya's coral reef thrives with a variety of life, and because of its immense size, you can tell many creatures lived there. First, I will write about sea turtles, and how they survived in the
There is a summary and response on "No One's a Mystery" by Elizabeth Tallent.618 words - 2 pages "No One's a Mystery" by Elizabeth Tallent - SummaryIn the Elizabeth Tallent's story "No One's Mystery" is talking about the eighteen-year-old girl-narrator and
Is there a need to increase the number of women on company boards in Australia?2984 words - 12 pages Law schools and MBA programs have been yielding equal numbers of male and female graduates for more than two decades now. One would reasonably expect, then, that women would populate the Australian boardrooms in large numbers. Yet the number is beyond dismal. Despite the improvements in women's working lives and prospects, discrimination and disadvantages still prevail, specifically the poor representation of women in...
Exploring John Steinbeck's Short Story, The Chrysanthemums: Is the Grass Really Greener on the Other Side?1051 words - 4 pages John Steinbeck used his short story, The Chrysanthemums, as a visual illustration to answer the adage, “Is the grass “really” greener on the other side?“ During The Great Depression, the American dream had become a nightmare. What was once the land of opportunity was now the land of desperation. What was once the land of hope and optimism had become the land of despair. The American people were questioning all the maxims on which they had based...
Is nature; hostile, benign or neutral? The effects of nature on humans and other species.886 words - 4 pages Drawing from my own experience, I believe that generally Nature is more benign than neutral or hostile, but this maybe due to the fact that I have not experienced disasters such as in New Orleans. The supplies we receive from our environment such as water and food keep us alive; without them we would not exist. So at times nature is a killer and at others a nurturer; it does what it can to keep the world in order. Nature is everything...
Ancient Medicine was based on Belief in the Supernatural. Is this true? (What evidence is there to support this statement?)846 words - 3 pages Ancient medicine covers medicine through Prehistoric, Egyptian, Greek and Roman times.Religion and belief in the supernatural were key factors in the development of ancient medicine. They influenced the way that people thought and the way in which they lived their lives. The supernatural could be used to explain aspects of medicine that people didn't understand at that time. Not everything was blamed on the supernatural, people did have...
this essay is over the events and studys of aristotles life there is a work sited page and work sited in the essay also1414 words - 6 pages After the death of Plato in 347 BC, Aristotle moved to Assos, or city in Asia Minor, where a friend of his, Hemias was the ruler. There he counseled Hermias and married his niece and adopted daughter Pythias. After Hermias was captured and executed by the Persians, Aristotle went to Pella, the Mededonian capital, where he became the tutor to the Kings...
Winston Churchill, British prime minister and one of history’s most influential statesmen, was undoubtedly a man with weighty questions on his mind. How best to save the British Empire? he must have mused. What will the postwar world look like? he surely wondered. But the legendary leader also focused his prodigious mind on less pragmatic questions. For instance: Is there life on other planets?
In fact, in 1939, Churchill penned a lengthy essay on this very topic, which was never published. Besides displaying a strong grasp of contemporary astrophysics and a scientific mind, he came to a breathtaking conclusion: We are probably not alone in the universe. The long-lost piece of Churchilliana has just floated up to the surface again, thanks to an article written by astrophysicist Mario Livio in this week's edition of the journal Nature analyzing Churchill's work.
“With hundreds of thousands of nebulae, each containing thousands of millions of suns, the odds are enormous that there must be immense numbers which possess planets whose circumstances would not render life impossible,” Churchill concluded in his essay. He wrote these words on the eve of World War II—more than half a century before exoplanets were discovered.
Until last year, Churchill's thoughts on the problem of alien life had been all but lost to history. The reason: His 11-page typed draft was never published. Sometime in the late 1950s, Churchill revised the essay while visiting the seaside villa of publisher Emery Reves, but the text still didn't see the light of day. It appears to have languished in the Reves house until Emery's wife Wendy gave it to the U.S. National Churchill Museum during the 1980s.
Last year, the museum’s new director, Timothy Riley, unearthed the essay in the museum's archives. When astrophysicist Mario Livio happened to visit the museum, Riley "thrust [the] typewritten essay" into his hands, Livio writes in Nature. Riley was eager to hear the perspective of an astrophysicist. And Livio, for his part, was floored. “Imagine my thrill that I may be the first scientist to examine this essay,” he writes in Nature.
Churchill did his homework, Livio reports. Though he probably didn't pore over peer-reviewed scientific literature, the statesman seems to have read enough, and spoke with enough top scientists—including the physicist Frederick Lindemann, his friend and later his official scientific adviser—to have had a strong grasp of the major theories and ideas of his time. But that wasn't what left the deepest impression on Livio.
“To me the most impressive part of the essay—other than the fact that he was interested in it at all, which is pretty remarkable—is really the way that he thinks,” Livio says. “He approached the problem just as a scientist today would. To answer his question 'Are we alone in the universe?' he started by defining life. Then he said, 'OK, what does life require? What are the necessary conditions for life to exist?'”
Churchill identified liquid water, for example, as a primary requirement. While he acknowledged the possibility that forms of life could exist dependent on some other liquid, he concluded that “nothing in our present knowledge entitles us to make such an assumption.”
"This is exactly what we still do today: Try to find life by following the water,” Livio says. “But next, Churchill asked 'What does it take for liquid water to be there?' And so he identified this thing that today we call the habitable zone.”
By breaking down the challenge into its component parts, Churchill ended up delving into the factors necessary to create what is now known as the “Goldilocks zone” around a star: that elusive region in which a life-sustaining planet could theoretically exist. In our own solar system, he concluded, only Mars and Venus could possibly harbor life outside of Earth. The other planets don't have the right temperatures, Churchill noted, while the Moon and asteroids lack sufficient gravity to trap gasses and sustain atmospheres.
Turning his gaze beyond our own solar system raised even more possibilities for life, at least in Churchill's mind. “The sun is merely one star in our galaxy, which contains several thousand millions of others,” he wrote. Planetary formation would be rather rare around those stars, he admitted, drawing on a then-popular theory of noted physicist and astronomer James Jeans. But what if that theory turned out to be incorrect? (In fact, it has now been disproven.)
“That's what I find really fascinating,” Livio notes. “The healthy skepticism that he displayed is remarkable.”
Churchill suggested that different planetary formation theories may mean that many such planets may exist which “will be the right size to keep on their surface water and possibly an atmosphere of some sort.” Of that group, some may also be “at the proper distance from their parent sun to maintain a suitable temperature.”
The statesman even expected that some day, “possibly even in the not very distant future,” visitors might see for themselves whether there is life on the moon, or even Mars.
But what was Winston Churchill doing penning a lengthy essay on the probability of alien life in the first place? After all, it was the eve of a war that would decide the fate of the free world, and Churchill was about to become Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.
Such an undertaking was actually quite typical for Churchill, notes Andrew Nahum, Keeper Emeritus at the Science Museum, London, because it reflects both his scientific curiosity and his recurring need to write for money. It was skill with the pen that often supported Churchill and his family's lavish lifestyle (recall that he won the 1953 Nobel Prize for Literature, with a monetary award of 175,293 Swedish Kroner worth about $275,000 today).
“One recent biography is entitled No More Champagne: Churchill And His Money,” Nahum says. “That was a phrase he put into a note to his wife about austerity measures. But he didn't know much about austerity. He liked luxury so he wrote like crazy, both books and articles that his agent circulated widely.”
That’s not to say that Churchill was simply slinging copy about aliens for a paycheck. “He was profoundly interested in the sciences and he read very widely,” notes Nahum, who curated the 2015 Science Museum exhibition “Churchill's Scientists.” Nahum relates the tale of how as Chancellor of the Exchequer, Churchill was once sent a book on quantum physics, and later admitted that it had occupied him for the better part of a day that should have been spent balancing the British budget.
He not only read scientific content voraciously, but wrote on the topic as well. In a 1924 issue of Nash's Pall Mall Magazine, Churchill anticipated the power of atomic weapons. “Might not a bomb no bigger than an orange be found to possess secret power to destroy a whole block of buildings nay, to blast a township at a stroke?” he warned. In 1932, he anticipated the rise of test-tube meat in the magazine Popular Mechanics: “Fifty years hence, we shall escape the absurdity of growing a whole chicken in order to eat the breast or the wing, by growing these parts separately in a suitable medium,” he wrote.
In 1939 he authored three essays, tackling not just extraterrestrial life but the evolution of life on Earth and the popular biology of the human body. Two were published during 1942 by the Sunday Dispatch, Nahum discovered when reading Churchill's papers at the University of Cambridge. It remains a mystery why his thoughts on alien life went unpublished.
In the rediscovered essay, Churchill admits that, because of the great distances between us and other planet-harboring stars, we may never know if his hunch that life is scattered among the vastness of the cosmos is correct. Yet even without proof, Churchill seems to have convinced himself that such a possibility was likely—perhaps by swapping his scientific mind for one more finely attuned to the human condition during the troubled 20th century.
“I, for one, am not so immensely impressed by the success we are making of our civilization here that I am prepared to think we are the only spot in this immense universe which contains living, thinking creatures,” he wrote, “or that we are the highest type of mental and physical development which has ever appeared in the vast compass of space and time.”
Seventy-five years after Churchill's bold speculations, there's still no proof that life exists on other worlds. But, as was often the case, his analysis of our own still seems prescient.
Like this article?
SIGN UP for our newsletter